|
parenting, asswatcher , bariya, man charged with having sex with 7 yr. old girl in 1996, comedies & family ent., catherine teener, old man having sex , milf hunter marie , trust, sexual health, npbulletin, weblog, northwest, queer, rockland, news online, milf sex pictures , high schools, milf hunter olive , chick tricks ,
|
Defenders of mandatory minimum sentences argue that the people—or their elected representatives—should be deciding how long criminals stay in prison. But O’Reilly’s politically motivated mischaracterization of the Cashman case illustrates the need for independent judges who can weigh all the facts and provide a fair ruling. Sentencing decisions shouldn’t be bill oreilly made in the political sphere, where ideologues like O’Reilly can use misleading stories to obscure the facts and whip up the public’s bloodlust. O’Reilly wasn’t really concerned about the punishment bill oreilly of one man. He used the case to serve a broader agenda, an agenda that calls for bill oreilly taking sentencing decisions out of the hands of judges. But, by showing that he and his allies are willing to play politics with such an important decision, O’Reilly undermined his own argument. If justice, not politics, is to determine sentencing decisions, then judges, not politicians and pundits, must decide. __________________ "Millions of Dog Owners Demand to Know: Who's a Good Boy?"
|
