 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| pictures of woman having sex , grinstead, sex between man and woman , special reports, hajni , 14 yr old sex , woman having sex with horses , milf hunter passwords , jeralyn, arrested, milf hunter rabbit , tarah , high school, browns, george will, animal woman sex , girl, | It could be done simultaneous to the trial, if they (the Jury) convict, they also find for whether or not the person has to register? What's yours? Posted by Roger May 5, 2004 03:42 PM Patrick- Similar to the civil commitment proceedings that they have for (real) pedophiles? Interesting idea. Posted by KDOG May 6, 2004 11:27 AM I think that is a great idea Patrick. Letting the on line shopping jury decide makes a lot more sense than a "zero tolerance" type registry where real pedophiles are mixed with public urinators and teens having sex with their on line shopping girlfriends. Great point. Posted on line shopping by Brenda May 7, 2004 03:07 PM I can honestly say I never had an opinion on sex offenders and where they should or should not live. I didn't even know there was a registry until yesterday. I've difinatly got an opinion now! We live in Albuquerque, NM, middle class neighborhood, right across the street from the emementary school my 3 girls go to. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| If this is true, there grinstead are a lot of potential felons out there! We used to call it grinstead "getting lucky", now its "getting sentenced" Posted by kdog May 5, 2004 02:32 PM Maybe in another hundred years you will have to be 35 to consent to sex or buy grinstead a beer. Posted by Patrick May 5, 2004 03:40 PM Kdog, I accept your point which is why I would support changing not abolishing the registration program. I agree that a drunk who pees in public is different from a pedophile who masterbates in a bush watching school children get off the bus. The 18 year old scenario you describe should be a case by case basis, but once you start allowing discretion you start allowing discrimination or at least the appearance of discrimination. So tell me how do you do it without the law of unintended consequences kicking in? My idea would be something akin to a separate penalty phase like they do in death cases, A jury would have to agree (Maybe only a majority of jurors) that the person needed to register. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
