 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| george w. bush, criminal, milf sex date , investigators, jobs, snopes, restaurant listings, onwisconsin.com, discrimination, o'rielly factor, bang , milf hunter ava devine , exclusive, criminal law, amateur pages , department of justice, netvideogirls , chicago business, sarah clarke, | If the molestor has nothing to lose, then there is no disincentive to escalating the crime. __________________ "Millions of Dog Owners Demand to Know: Who's a Good Boy?" sex woman and guys pictures ~Headline in The Onion ThomasDad View Public Profile Send a private message to ThomasDad Find sex woman and guys pictures all posts by ThomasDad Add ThomasDad to Your Buddy List #5 02-26-2006, 11:26 AM SLK230 Computer Man Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Tucson and Loving It (Formerly San Juan Capistrano, Ca) Posts: 10,264 Quote: Originally Posted sex woman and guys pictures by ThomasDad No, but I guess this means you think highly enough of yourself to even suspect such a thing. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| long as you are being so snopes knit picky Jessica's law wouldn't prevent any child molestation. snopes It would only punish convicted child molesters with a 1 strike and your gone for 20 years sentence. No law can prevent crime. The point of course being that we must get tough on child molesters. Child molestation should be a 1 strike and your gone for 20 years mandatory punishment. Are you against putting child molesters away for a minimum of 20 or more years? I am in favor of snopes thoughtful response and not knee-jerk response. Placing a mandatory 20 years for a first offense wouldn't prevent a crime (as you note) but it might create an incentive for a molester to eliminate the only witness to his/her crime. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
