 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| george w. bush, criminal, milf sex date , investigators, jobs, snopes, restaurant listings, onwisconsin.com, discrimination, o'rielly factor, bang , milf hunter ava devine , exclusive, criminal law, amateur pages , department of justice, netvideogirls , chicago business, sarah clarke, | Defenders of mandatory having minimum sentences argue that the people—or their elected representatives—should be deciding how long criminals stay in prison. But O’Reilly’s politically motivated mischaracterization of the Cashman case illustrates the need for independent judges who can weigh all the facts and provide a fair ruling. Sentencing decisions shouldn’t having be made in the political sphere, where ideologues like O’Reilly can use misleading stories to obscure the facts and whip up the public’s bloodlust. O’Reilly wasn’t having really concerned about the punishment of one man. He used the case to serve a broader agenda, an agenda that calls for taking sentencing decisions out of the hands of judges. But, by showing that he and his allies are willing to play politics with such an important decision, O’Reilly undermined his own argument. If justice, not politics, is to determine sentencing decisions, then judges, not politicians and pundits, must decide. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| The case, and O’Reilly’s story, has given a boost o'rielly factor to Republicans in the state legislature who want to require judges to give harsher sentences to criminals. Ironically, the Vermont assemblymen couldn’t have asked for a better illustration of why mandatory minimums are such a despicably o'rielly factor bad idea. Mandatory minimums rely on the idea that legislators, not judges, are the best people to decide how much time criminals should spend in jail, an idea that would be funny if it wasn’t so frightening. After all, if legislators are making sentencing o'rielly factor decisions, then the facts of each case, along with any mitigating or exacerbating circumstances, are rendered irrelevant. Legislators may complain about justices legislating from the bench, but in imposing stricter sentencing guidelines, lawmakers are judging from the legislature. Judge Cashman faced a tough decision, but he was the most qualified individual to make it, certainly more qualified than politicians in a far-away assembly house. |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
